Antisemitism in Italy
Jewish life in Italy long predates the modern nation. As Christianity acquired political power, church teaching portrayed Jews as collectively guilty or spiritually inferior.
Explore ItalyPublished by WTJPublication updated
A Roman community becomes a religious outsider
Jewish life in Italy long predates the modern nation. As Christianity acquired political power, church teaching portrayed Jews as collectively guilty or spiritually inferior. In papal territories, that hierarchy became restrictions on residence and work. Other Italian rulers made different choices. Ghetto walls later gave exclusion a physical form. Emancipation removed those barriers, but Mussolini’s 1938 racial laws imposed a new test based on ancestry.
Ancient Rome–papal centuries
Religious hierarchy · The neighbour who predates the nation
Italy’s Jews were already at home when religious authorities began narrowing their place.
A long-established community
Jews lived in Rome centuries before Italy became a unified state. Over time they developed distinctive religious traditions and communal institutions. The claim that Jews were inherently foreign obscured this local history. Their position changed with religious and political power, rather than with the length of their residence.
A charge passed down
Christian teaching often assigned collective responsibility for Jesus’s death to Jews. A claim about sacred history could become suspicion toward living neighbours. It transformed an ordinary religious minority into a symbol of wrongdoing and helped justify treating its members as inferior.
Different rulers, different doors
The peninsula was divided among rulers with different interests and policies. Jewish residence and occupations could be permitted in one jurisdiction and restricted in another. This patchwork mattered: exclusion was enforced through identifiable laws and authorities, rather than one attitude shared by every Italian.
1516–1870
Ghetto walls · A city needs its neighbours, then locks them in
Venice and papal Rome confined Jewish residents while relying on their work.
Venice, 1516
Venice ordered Jews to reside in a designated district in 1516. Gates controlled movement, especially at night. The city admitted a community but imposed separation on it. The neighbourhood that gave the word ghetto its wider meaning was both a place of Jewish life and an instrument of restriction.
Rome, 1555
Pope Paul IV established Rome’s ghetto in 1555. Papal policy restricted Jewish residence and economic activity. Religious hierarchy acquired a daily geography: where a family could live and how its members could earn a living. Roman Jews remained part of the city under rules that denied equal belonging.
The wall is not the whole life
Behind the imposed limits, Jews sustained worship, learning and family life. The existence of these communities should not turn confinement into a quaint tradition. Rome’s enforced ghetto ended in 1870, when the city’s incorporation into the Italian kingdom displaced papal political authority.
Nineteenth century–1938
Emancipation & reversal · Citizenship opens a door that Fascism closes
Unification widened rights; the Fascist regime later decided Jewish ancestry overrode them.
Equal citizens in the kingdom
Italian unification extended emancipation as territories entered the new kingdom. Jews could participate more fully in professional and civic life. In Rome, 1870 ended enforced ghetto residence. These changes dismantled legal disabilities that had made Jewish belonging conditional on religious identity.
Participation cannot buy safety
Italian Jews held varied political views, and some supported Fascism before its explicitly antisemitic turn. Neither patriotic service nor earlier loyalty protected them once the regime adopted racial exclusion. Antisemitism judged people through an imposed group identity, making individual conduct irrelevant.
The reversal of 1938
Mussolini’s government introduced anti-Jewish racial laws in 1938. Jews were excluded from schools and public employment and subjected to other restrictions. Italy had not yet been occupied by Germany. Its own regime made the decision to translate racial prejudice into enforceable national policy.
1938–1945
Persecution & deportation · A classroom ban becomes a threat to life
Italian exclusion and later German occupation were separate stages of an escalating persecution.
Ancestry replaces the person
The 1938 laws defined who counted as Jewish through ancestry and restricted education, employment and marriage. Children could lose school places because of their parents. The rules presented invented racial categories as official facts, then used those categories to decide whose everyday life could continue.
Occupation changes the danger
After Germany occupied much of Italy in 1943, Jews faced arrests and deportation to killing centres. German forces and Italian Fascist collaborators participated. The earlier years of legal persecution and the later machinery of murder were connected, but they were not the same policy under the same conditions.
Mario Finzi’s interrupted life
Mario Finzi, a young Italian Jewish lawyer and musician, lost his legal career under the racial laws. He later helped Jewish refugees before being arrested and deported to Auschwitz, where he died. His life connects an exclusionary rule with the choices and losses of an identifiable person.
2023–present
October 7 & today · October 7 & today
Italy’s Catholic, Fascist and communist inheritances meet Islamist mobilization in the surge after October 7.
The old accusations do not disappear
Italy’s Jews had lived behind papal ghetto walls and under teaching that blamed Jews collectively for Jesus’s death. The Catholic Church rejected that collective blame in 1965, but a formal repudiation could not instantly erase centuries of cultural suspicion.
Fascism supplied a different accusation: Jews as a racial danger to the nation. Mussolini’s 1938 laws turned it into exclusion from work and public life. Before October 7, BOND researchers still found neo-Fascist antisemitism alongside conspiracy about Jewish power. These inheritances made images of the dangerous or secretly powerful Jew available long after the institutions that first enforced them had changed.
When communist and Islamist causes meet
Parts of Italy’s communist left see Israel as an arm of American power. Hamas can then become resistance against a shared enemy. Giovanni Giacalone’s contribution to CDEC’s 2025 report describes Islamist supporters and Palestinian organizations demonstrating alongside CARC, NPCI and Rete dei Comunisti: practical red–green cooperation.
CDEC also records Jews, including Holocaust survivors, denounced as Zionist accomplices in genocide. The accusation demanded that Jews answer as Jews. Images of Jews as bloodthirsty child killers revived the older blood libel; far-right conspiracy could likewise replace Jew with Zionist while keeping its imagined hidden controller. Government criticism is legitimate. Selective attention can raise a double-standard question; collective guilt, demonization and demands that Jews prove political innocence reveal the older prejudice.
Old hatred, new violence
After October 7, CDEC researchers described a sharp rise in incidents. The conflict gave older Catholic and Fascist stereotypes, radical-left enemy stories and Islamist hostility a shared focus. Their circulation could reinforce one another without all the actors belonging to one organization.
Migration is part of the contemporary setting, but recent arrivals are not the whole story. In twelve of eighteen assault cases in 2025, CDEC described perpetrators as North African, Muslim and/or second-generation Italian. Those are overlapping descriptions of particular cases. Together with the mobilizations above, they show how local inheritances and transnational hostility reach Italian Jews, increasingly through physical attacks as well as exclusion and abuse.