Antisemitism in New Zealand

Jewish traders and families helped build colonial communities in Aotearoa New Zealand from the 1830s. Civic participation was possible early, yet later immigration rules denied entry to many Jews escaping Nazism.

Explore New Zealand

Published by WTJPublication updated

Belonging at home, barriers at the border

Jewish traders and families helped build colonial communities in Aotearoa New Zealand from the 1830s. Civic participation was possible early, yet later immigration rules denied entry to many Jews escaping Nazism. These histories unfolded on Māori land within British colonization. They show that acceptance of established neighbours and willingness to admit endangered newcomers could differ sharply. Today's antisemitism also draws on international conspiracy and collective blame, while local people organize against it.

1830s to 1860s

Early communities · A small community puts down roots

Jewish arrivals build religious and civic lives within a colony already shaped by Māori histories.

Jewish prayer in Wellington

Abraham Hort arrived from London in 1843 and organized a Jewish prayer service in Wellington that January. Families were creating communal institutions alongside their working lives. Their story belongs within British colonization of an already inhabited country; European arrival did not begin the history of Aotearoa.

Communities in several ports

Jewish traders were active in the north from around 1830. The gold rushes later brought English, German and Polish Jews to the South Island, including Hokitika. Movement between towns helped form several communities, rather than one uniform group with a single occupation or migration story.

Making ordinary life possible

Congregations established synagogues, burial societies, education and assistance for newcomers. Such institutions sustained everyday Jewish life across a small, dispersed population. Their presence matters alongside the history of prejudice: Jews were neighbours shaping their communities, rather than simply people acted upon by governments or hostile movements.

1861 to 1897

Civic participation · Public achievement within colonial society

Julius Vogel's political career and Ethel Benjamin's legal work reveal participation, colonial power and unequal opportunity.

A newspaper editor becomes prime minister

Julius Vogel arrived in Dunedin in 1861 and edited the Otago Daily Times. He became New Zealand's first Jewish premier in 1873. His career demonstrates access to high office within the colony, without making one prominent man's success proof that all prejudice had disappeared.

Participation in colonial power

Vogel promoted borrowing, public works and immigration. Rapid Crown acquisition of Māori land was central to this programme. Recognizing his Jewish background does not place him outside colonial power or make his policies representative of Jews. Political decisions must be examined through their specific consequences for the people affected.

Ethel Benjamin enters the law

Ethel Benjamin became New Zealand's first woman lawyer in 1897. Her work served Jewish clients and independent businesswomen, but the male legal establishment restricted her access to its library, dinners and professional mentoring. These were documented barriers against a woman lawyer; they should not all be relabelled as religious discrimination.

1931 to 1939

Barriers to refuge · An immigration application can decide a family's future

Immigration preferences and official discretion narrow escape routes for people facing Nazi persecution.

Who is judged suitable?

The 1920 immigration law required permits from people outside preferred British and Irish categories, leaving suitability to ministerial discretion. In 1931, restrictions on European newcomers tightened further. Rules about capital, employment and skills gave officials considerable power over applicants whose need for safety did not fit an economic selection system.

A limited route to safety

About 1,100 mainly Jewish refugees from Nazi Europe were accepted between Hitler's rise and the outbreak of war. Many others were refused as supposedly difficult to absorb. Admission offered real safety to those who arrived, while leaving the wider restrictive policy intact. This estimate concerns arrivals over several years, not a count of Holocaust survivors.

Neighbours support refugee applications

The Christchurch Refugees' Emergency Committee supported applications by Jewish and other refugees from Hitler's regime before war began in September 1939. Its work shows that restrictive decisions were contested locally. Helping an applicant required organized effort, and a sympathetic committee could not itself grant the permission that immigration officials controlled.

1933 to 1945

The Holocaust · A distant refuge with restricted entry

New Zealand remained outside Nazi occupation. Its connection to the Holocaust includes restricted refuge, separated families and survivors who later made new homes there.

Concentration camps imprisoned people under brutal conditions, often with forced labor. Extermination camps were built for systematic mass murder. Auschwitz-Birkenau combined both functions.

Refugees refused permission to enter

In a 2021 remembrance speech, the Governor-General stated that New Zealand rejected 1,731 formal Jewish immigration applications between 1936 and 1938, over 70 percent of those received. A further 727 Jewish refugees were admitted in that interval. These are application and admission figures for specified years, not a tally of the fates of everyone refused.

Hans Johnson's long journey

Hans Johnson's family preserved his account of leaving Germany in 1938. An entry permit did not make departure immediate: passage was difficult to book, and Nazi passport requirements and a Gestapo inspection added danger. His route through Britain and Canada eventually brought him to New Zealand. One successful escape reveals obstacles without telling us what happened to every applicant.

Safety and family separation

After reaching New Zealand, Johnson tried unsuccessfully to obtain entry permits for his parents. They were forced to work in Berlin, deported to Theresienstadt and murdered at Auschwitz in October 1944. His testimony connects one family's loss with a specific failed attempt at rescue. Safety for a son did not mean safety for the parents who had helped him leave.

After 1945

Rebuilding & memory · New lives carry histories of loss

Survivors and later migrants shape a living community, while remembrance also asks what New Zealand refused to do.

Survival has different paths

People who later settled in New Zealand had survived through different routes, including hiding, escape and confinement in Nazi camps. Their experiences cannot be reduced to a single survivor story. Listening to their accounts connects family histories overseas with the lives they rebuilt after reaching a new home.

Lives beyond survival

Survivors' accounts also describe work, music, family and civic participation in New Zealand. These later lives belong to the history alongside persecution and bereavement. A person was more than the violence endured, and rebuilding a future did not cancel the loss of relatives or the effects of displacement.

Remembering a national refusal

In her Holocaust remembrance speech in January 2021, Governor-General Patsy Reddy acknowledged New Zealand's rejection of Jewish refugees. She connected remembrance with confronting racism and upholding obligations to refugees. Official recognition does not undo those decisions, but it challenges a simple national story of welcoming refugees and remaining innocent through distance.

2023 to 2026

October 7 & today · October 7 & today

Online conspiracy and collective blame reach a small community with deep local roots; neighbours also organize against hostility.

A distant war enters the classroom

After the Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023, the Holocaust Centre of New Zealand received increased complaints about antisemitism in schools. It asked parents about children's experiences and pressed educational institutions to respond.

A child in New Zealand does not decide the actions of a government overseas. Making that child answer for Israel turns political anger into collective blame. The Centre's survey gives participating families a voice; it cannot establish how common these experiences were among every pupil.

The accusation travels between screens

In material collected during 2024, the Online Hate Prevention Institute found both older Jewish-control conspiracies and Israel-related collective blame. The mixture differed across platforms. This was a selected sample of online hostility, rather than a portrait of every New Zealander.

NZSIS's 2026 assessment also describes people exploring conflicting extremist ideologies online. Opposing labels do not prevent the same person from consuming different hateful narratives. That observation does not establish an organized alliance or identify the motives behind every incident.

Choosing to remain neighbours

The Jewish Council reported 143 antisemitic incidents in 2025, its highest calendar-year total, as summarized by One Community. The figure records community reports; it does not mean every incident was an assault.

There were also public commitments to a different future. On 22 July 2025, Jewish and Muslim signatories presented the Harmony Accord at Government House. They pledged action against discrimination and isolation. The agreement records a choice to work together, while leaving its practical results to be judged over time.